Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 40
1.
J Clin Neurosci ; 123: 151-156, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38574687

BACKGROUND: Although prior work demonstrated the surprising accuracy of Large Language Models (LLMs) on neurosurgery board-style questions, their use in day-to-day clinical situations warrants further investigation. This study assessed GPT-4.0's responses to common clinical questions across various subspecialties of neurosurgery. METHODS: A panel of attending neurosurgeons formulated 35 general neurosurgical questions spanning neuro-oncology, spine, vascular, functional, pediatrics, and trauma. All questions were input into GPT-4.0 with a prespecified, standard prompt. Responses were evaluated by two attending neurosurgeons, each on a standardized scale for accuracy, safety, and helpfulness. Citations were indexed and evaluated against identifiable database references. RESULTS: GPT-4.0 responses were consistent with current medical guidelines and accounted for recent advances in the field 92.8 % and 78.6 % of the time respectively. Neurosurgeons reported GPT-4.0 responses providing unrealistic information or potentially risky information 14.3 % and 7.1 % of the time respectively. Assessed on 5-point scales, responses suggested that GPT-4.0 was clinically useful (4.0 ± 0.6), relevant (4.7 ± 0.3), and coherent (4.9 ± 0.2). The depth of clinical responses varied (3.7 ± 0.6), and "red flag" symptoms were missed 7.1 % of the time. Moreover, GPT-4.0 cited 86 references (2.46 citations per answer), of which only 50 % were deemed valid, and 77.1 % of responses contained at least one inappropriate citation. CONCLUSION: Current general LLM technology can offer generally accurate, safe, and helpful neurosurgical information, but may not fully evaluate medical literature or recent field advances. Citation generation and usage remains unreliable. As this technology becomes more ubiquitous, clinicians will need to exercise caution when dealing with it in practice.


Neurosurgeons , Neurosurgery , Humans , Neurosurgery/methods , Neurosurgery/standards , Neurosurgeons/standards , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Neurosurgical Procedures/standards , Language
2.
Neurosurg Focus ; 54(6): E3, 2023 06.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37283326

OBJECTIVE: Machine learning (ML) has become an increasingly popular tool for use in neurosurgical research. The number of publications and interest in the field have recently seen significant expansion in both quantity and complexity. However, this also places a commensurate burden on the general neurosurgical readership to appraise this literature and decide if these algorithms can be effectively translated into practice. To this end, the authors sought to review the burgeoning neurosurgical ML literature and to develop a checklist to help readers critically review and digest this work. METHODS: The authors performed a literature search of recent ML papers in the PubMed database with the terms "neurosurgery" AND "machine learning," with additional modifiers "trauma," "cancer," "pediatric," and "spine" also used to ensure a diverse selection of relevant papers within the field. Papers were reviewed for their ML methodology, including the formulation of the clinical problem, data acquisition, data preprocessing, model development, model validation, model performance, and model deployment. RESULTS: The resulting checklist consists of 14 key questions for critically appraising ML models and development techniques; these are organized according to their timing along the standard ML workflow. In addition, the authors provide an overview of the ML development process, as well as a review of key terms, models, and concepts referenced in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: ML is poised to become an increasingly important part of neurosurgical research and clinical care. The authors hope that dissemination of education on ML techniques will help neurosurgeons to critically review new research better and more effectively integrate this technology into their practices.


Neurosurgery , Reading , Humans , Checklist , Machine Learning , Neurosurgical Procedures
3.
Interv Neuroradiol ; : 15910199231152513, 2023 Jan 26.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36703285

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fractal dimension is an objective metric for the notion of structural complexity. We sought to investigate differences in structural complexity between healthy and affected territories of cerebral vasculature in moyamoya, as well as associated scalp vasculature and native transdural collaterals in patients with moyamoya by comparing their respective fractal dimensions. METHODS: Our cohort consisted of 15 transdural collaterals from 12 patients with unilateral anterior circulation moyamoya. Frames of distal arterial vasculature from internal and external carotid angiograms were selected then automatically segmented and also manually annotated by a cerebrovascular surgeon. In the affected hemisphere, the region with transdural collateral supply was compared to the contralateral region. The resulting skeletonized angiograms were analyzed for their fractal dimensions. RESULTS: We found the average fractal dimension (Df) of the moyamoya-side ICA was 1.82 with slightly different means for the anteroposterial (AP) and lateral views (mean = 1.82; mean = 1.81). The overall mean for healthy cerebral vasculature was also found to be 1.82 (AP: mean = 1.83; lateral: mean = 1.81). Mean Df of native transdural collaterals was found to be 1.82 (AP: mean = 1.83; lateral: mean = 1.81). The mean Df difference between autosegmented and manually segmented images was 0.013. CONCLUSION: In accordance with the clinical understanding of moyamoya disease, the distal arterial structural complexity is not affected in moyamoya, and is maintained by transdural collaterals formed by vasculogenesis. Autosegmentation of cerebral vasculature is also shown to be accurate when compared to manual segmentation.

4.
Semin Neurol ; 41(3): 247-255, 2021 06.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34010969

Traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) is a life-changing and potentially overwhelming event. The sudden disruption of the spinal cord's integrity necessitates rapid attention at a specialized medical center, and involves a multilateral collaboration between neurologists, spine surgeons, critical care physicians, and trauma specialists. Even with care under ideal conditions, many tSCI patients have significant disability that persists for the rest of their lives. However, recently, we have seen a proliferation in clinical and translational trials that offer the promise that new treatments may be available soon.


Spinal Cord Injuries , Humans , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy
5.
Int J Spine Surg ; 15(6): 1103-1114, 2021 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35086867

BACKGROUND: Interbody fusion is a widely utilized and accepted procedure to treat advanced debilitating lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD). Increasingly, surgeons are seeking interbody devices that are large for stability and grafting purposes but can be inserted with less invasive techniques. To achieve these contrary objectives a novel, conformable mesh interbody fusion device was designed to be placed in the disc space through a small portal and filled with bone graft in situ to a large size. This design can reduce the risk of trauma to surrounding structures while creating a large graft footprint that intimately contours to the patient's own anatomy. The purpose of this Investigational Device Exempt (IDE) trial was to evaluate the perioperative and long-term results of this novel conformable mesh interbody fusion device. METHODS: This investigation is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, Food and Drug Administration and Institutional Review Board-approved IDE, performance goal trial. A total of 102 adults presenting with DDD at a single level between L2 and S1 and unresponsive to 6 months conservative care had instrumented lumbar interbody fusion. Validated assessment tools include 100 mm visual analog scale for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for function, single question survey for patient satisfaction, and computed tomography (CT) scan for fusion. Patients were enrolled across 10 geographically distributed sites. Pain/ODI surveys, physical evaluations, and imaging were performed serially through 24 months. Specifically, CT was performed at 12 and, if not fused, 24 months. Independent radiologists assessed CTs for fusion. An independent committee adjudicated adverse events. Patients with complete data at 24 months were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Ninety-six (96, 94% follow-up rate) patients (57.0 ± 12.0 years, 50.0% female, Body Mass Index 30.6 ± 4.9) reported average decreased low back pain from baseline of 45.0 ± 26.6 at 6 weeks and 51.4 ± 26.2 at 24 months. Right/left leg pain reduced by 28.9 ± 36.7/37.8±32.4 at 6 weeks and 30.5±33.0/40.3 34.6 at 24 months. Mean ODI improved 17.1 ± 18.7 from baseline to 6 weeks and 32.0 ± 18.5 by 24 months. At 24 months, 91.7% of patients rated their procedure as excellent/good. Fusion rates were 97.9% (94/96) at 12 months, and 99% (95/96) at 24 months. Mean operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay were 2.6 ± 0.9 hours, 137 ± 217 mL, and 2.3 ± 1.2 days, respectively. No device-related serious adverse events have occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically significant outcomes for pain, function, fusion, and device safety were demonstrated in this population. Substantial clinical improvements occur by 6 weeks postoperative and continue to improve to 24 months. The successful outcomes observed in this trial support use of this novel device in an instrumented lumbar interbody fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This reports substantiates that the preliminary 1-year findings published earlier for this investigation are confirmed and the fusion rates and that patient improvements reported are sustained through 2 years.

6.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 46(2): E126-E132, 2021 Jan 15.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32991515

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective multicenter investigational device exempt trial is underway evaluating a novel conformable mesh interbody fusion device in subjects undergoing single-level fusion for degenerative disc disease. Patients meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria were offered enrollment. There is no comparative group in this study. OBJECTIVE: Establish the short and long-term safety and effectiveness of a novel conformable mesh interbody fusion device in subjects undergoing single-level fusion for degenerative disc disease unresponsive to conservative care. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion remains a critical procedure for patients with degenerative lumbar disc disease. Increasingly minimally invasive techniques have been proposed to minimize muscle dissection and tissue damage with the goal of minimizing pain and length of stay. METHODS: One hundred two subjects were enrolled across 10 sites. Ninety nine subjects remained available for follow-up at 12-months. Physical evaluations/imaging were performed serially through 12-months. Validated assessment tools included 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for function, and computerized tomography scan for fusion. Independent committees were used to identify adverse events and for assessment of radiographic fusion. RESULTS: Reductions in low back pain (LBP)/leg pain and improvements in functional status occur early and are maintained through 12-month follow-up. Mean VAS-LBP change from baseline to 6-weeks post-op (-46 mm) continued to improve through 12 months (-51 mm). Similar trends were observed for leg pain. Mean ODI change from baseline to 6 weeks post-op (-17) was almost doubled by 12 months (-32). Fusion rates at 12-months are high (98%). No device-related serious adverse events have occurred. CONCLUSION: 12-month outcomes demonstrated excellent patient compliance and positive outcomes for pain, function, fusion, and device safety. Clinical improvements were observed by 6-weeks post-op and appear durable up to 1 year later. A novel mesh interbody device may provide an alternative means of interbody fusion that reduces connective tissue disruption.Level of Evidence: 3.


Spinal Fusion/instrumentation , Surgical Mesh , Adult , Aged , Back Pain , Female , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Lumbosacral Region/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies , Prostheses and Implants , Treatment Outcome , Visual Analog Scale
7.
J Neurosurg Spine ; : 1-6, 2020 Jan 17.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31952035

OBJECTIVE: Minimal access ablative techniques have emerged as a less invasive option for spinal metastatic disease reduction and separation from neural tissue. Compared with heat-based ablation modalities, percutaneous image-guided cryoablation allows for more distinct visualization of treatment margins. The authors report on a series of patients undergoing MRI-guided cryoablation as a feasible method for treating spinal metastatic disease. METHODS: A total of 14 patients with metastatic spine disease undergoing MR-monitored cryoablation were prospectively enrolled. Procedures were performed in an advanced imaging operating suite with the use of both CT and MRI to gain access to the spinal canal and monitor real-time cryoablation. RESULTS: The average age was 54.5 years (range 35-81 years). The mean preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score was 79.3 (range 35-90). The average radiographic follow-up was 7.1 months (range 25-772 days), and the average clinical follow-up was 9.8 months (range 7-943 days). In 10 patients with epidural disease, 7 patients underwent postprocedural imaging, and of these 71% (5/7) had stable or reduced radiographic disease burden. Bone regrowth was observed in 63% (5/8) of patients with bone ablation during the treatment who had postoperative imaging. Pre- and postoperative visual analog scale scores were obtained, and a significant reduction in these scores was found following ablation. There were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: MR-guided cryoablation is a minimally invasive treatment option for metastatic spine disease. In patients with epidural disease, the majority experienced tumor reduction or arrest at follow-up. In addition, pain was significantly improved following ablation. The average hospital stay was short, and the procedure was safe in a range of patients who are otherwise not ideal candidates for standard treatment.

9.
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) ; 18(4): 391-397, 2020 04 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31313813

BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common neurosurgical condition, with symptoms ranging from headaches to coma. Operative evacuation is the treatment of choice. Subdural reaccumulation leading to reoperation is a vexing postoperative complication. OBJECTIVE: To present a novel technique for intraoperative aspiration of pneumocephalus via a subdural drain following SDH evacuation as a method of reducing potential subdural space and promoting cerebral expansion, thereby decreasing SDH recurrence. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 15 patients who underwent operative evacuation of cSDH between 2008 and 2015 were assessed. Six patients underwent a small craniotomy with intraoperative pneumocephalus aspiration. These patients were matched by age, gender, and anticoagulation status to 9 patients who underwent evacuation of SDH without pneumocephalus aspiration. Quantitative volumetric analysis was performed on the preoperative, postoperative, and 1-mo follow-up computed tomography scan to assess the subdural volume. RESULTS: In the immediate postoperative period, there was no difference in the percentage of residual subdural fluid between the aspiration and control groups (0.291 vs 0.251; P = 1.00). There was a decrease in amount of pneumocephalus present when the aspiration technique was applied (0.182 vs 0.386; P = .041). At 1-mo follow-up, there was a decrease in the residual cSDH volume between the aspiration and the control groups (28.7 mL vs 60.8 mL; P = .011). The long-term evacuation rate was greater in the aspiration group (75.4% vs 51.6%; P = .015). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative aspiration of cSDH cavity is a safe technique that may enhance cerebral expansion and reduce likelihood of cSDH recurrence.


Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic , Pneumocephalus , Craniotomy , Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic/diagnostic imaging , Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic/surgery , Humans , Pneumocephalus/diagnostic imaging , Pneumocephalus/etiology , Pneumocephalus/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Subdural Space/diagnostic imaging , Subdural Space/surgery
10.
J Neurosurg Spine ; : 1-7, 2019 Sep 06.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31491759

OBJECTIVE: Recent advances in computer vision have revolutionized many aspects of society but have yet to find significant penetrance in neurosurgery. One proposed use for this technology is to aid in the identification of implanted spinal hardware. In revision operations, knowing the manufacturer and model of previously implanted fusion systems upfront can facilitate a faster and safer procedure, but this information is frequently unavailable or incomplete. The authors present one approach for the automated, high-accuracy classification of anterior cervical hardware fusion systems using computer vision. METHODS: Patient records were searched for those who underwent anterior-posterior (AP) cervical radiography following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) at the authors' institution over a 10-year period (2008-2018). These images were then cropped and windowed to include just the cervical plating system. Images were then labeled with the appropriate manufacturer and system according to the operative record. A computer vision classifier was then constructed using the bag-of-visual-words technique and KAZE feature detection. Accuracy and validity were tested using an 80%/20% training/testing pseudorandom split over 100 iterations. RESULTS: A total of 321 total images were isolated containing 9 different ACDF systems from 5 different companies. The correct system was identified as the top choice in 91.5% ± 3.8% of the cases and one of the top 2 or 3 choices in 97.1% ± 2.0% and 98.4 ± 13% of the cases, respectively. Performance persisted despite the inclusion of variable sizes of hardware (i.e., 1-level, 2-level, and 3-level plates). Stratification by the size of hardware did not improve performance. CONCLUSIONS: A computer vision algorithm was trained to classify at least 9 different types of anterior cervical fusion systems using relatively sparse data sets and was demonstrated to perform with high accuracy. This represents one of many potential clinical applications of machine learning and computer vision in neurosurgical practice.

11.
World Neurosurg ; 131: e514-e520, 2019 Nov.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31394365

BACKGROUND: The cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) has often been identified as an area of biomechanical vulnerability; however, few studies have examined the relative merits of extending fusions across this area. In this study, we sought to investigate the tradeoffs involved in fusing across the CTJ in cases of elective posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion. METHODS: We conducted a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing elective, multilevel, posterior cervical decompression and fusion for degenerative cervical stenosis. Data were collected on baseline clinical and radiographic variables as well any subsequent complications or reoperations. Outcomes measures were compared between those who received fusion stopping at C7 with those who received fusion crossing the CTJ, with multivariate logistic regression used to adjust for any known confounders. RESULTS: Patients whose fusion crossed the CTJ were found to have more levels fused (mean: 5.8 vs. 3.5 levels, P < 0.0001), longer surgical times (mean: 216 vs. 149 minutes, P < 0.0001), and higher estimated blood losses (mean: 475 vs. 116 mL, P < 0.0001) despite no significant differences in number of levels decompressed (mean: 4.2 vs. 4.3 levels, P = 0.63). The groups did not differ in overall reoperation rate (10.8% vs. 9.4%, P = 1.00), but crossing the CTJ was associated with a higher rate of wound dehiscence (7.8% vs. 0%, P = 0.03). This difference persisted in multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Crossing the CTJ was associated with increased surgical time, estimated blood loss, and the rates of wound dehiscence. These tradeoffs should be considered in planning posterior cervical decompression and fusion procedures.


Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Laminectomy/methods , Spinal Cord Compression/surgery , Spinal Fusion/methods , Spinal Stenosis/surgery , Spondylosis/surgery , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Aged , Blood Loss, Surgical , Cohort Studies , Decompression, Surgical , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Operative Time , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Cord Compression/etiology , Spinal Stenosis/complications , Spondylosis/complications
13.
Neurosurgery ; 84(1): E7-E8, 2019 01 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30418585
15.
Neurospine ; 15(4): 338-347, 2018 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30531655

OBJECTIVE: Patients with extradural spine tumors are at an increased risk for intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks and postoperative wound dehiscence due to radiotherapy and other comorbidities related to systemic cancer treatment. In this case series, we discuss our experience with the management of intraoperative durotomies and wound closure strategies for this complex surgical patient population. METHODS: We reviewed our recent single-center experience with spine surgery for primarily extradural tumors, with attention to intraoperative durotomy occurrence and postoperative wound-related complications. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients underwent tumor resection and spinal reconstruction with instrumented fusion for a multitude of pathologies. Twelve of the 105 patients (11.4%) reviewed had intraoperative durotomies. Of these, 3 underwent reoperation for a delayed complication, including 1 epidural hematoma, 1 retained drain, and 1 wound infection. Of the 93 uncomplicated index operations, there were a total of 9 reoperations: 2 for epidural hematoma, 3 for wound infection, 2 for wound dehiscence, and 2 for recurrent primary disease. One patient was readmitted for a delayed spinal fluid leak. The average length of stay for patients with and without intraoperative durotomy was 7.3 and 5.9 days, respectively, with a nonsignificant trend for an increased length of stay in the durotomy cases (p=0.098). CONCLUSION: Surgery for extradural tumor resections can be complicated by CSF leaks due to the proximity of the tumor to the dura. When encountered, a variety of strategies may be employed to minimize subsequent morbidity.

17.
World Neurosurg ; 120: e562-e572, 2018 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30165226

OBJECTIVE: For cases of cervical osteomyelitis that require surgery, concern has continued regarding instrumentation owing to the potential for bacterial seeding of the hardware. We performed a systematic review of the current data. METHODS: A search was performed using Medline, Embase, and Ovid for articles using the keywords "cervical osteomyelitis/spondylodiscitis" and "fusion" or "instrumentation" reported from 1980 to 2017. Prospective or retrospective studies describing ≥2 patients with cervical osteomyelitis were included in the analysis; non-English reports were excluded. Individual patients were excluded from the final analysis if they had previously undergone spinal instrumentation. RESULTS: A total of 239 patients from 24 studies met our criteria. Surgical approaches were classified as anterior-only, combined anteroposterior, and posterior-only for 64.8%, 31.9%, and 3.3% of the patients respectively. Of the patients treated using an anterior-only approach, 76.5% had received anterior plating and 85.3%, a cage or spacer implants. Of the patients who had undergone combined approaches, 85.1% underwent circumferential fixation and 14.9%, anterior debridement with posterior instrumentation. The follow-up period ranged from 6 weeks to 11 years (mean, 31.0 months). All the studies reporting the fusion rates, except for 1, reported a 100% fusion rate. The reported rates of pain improvement and neurologic recovery were favorable. The incidence of hardware failure and wound complications was 4.6% and 4.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite placing instrumentation during active infection, the rates of hardware failure and wound complications were comparable to those of elective cervical spine procedures. These results suggest that surgical intervention with instrumentation is a safe treatment option for patients with cervical spine osteomyelitis.


Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Neurosurgical Procedures/instrumentation , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Osteomyelitis/surgery , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation , Spinal Fusion/methods , Humans , Internal Fixators
18.
J Clin Neurosci ; 50: 160-162, 2018 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29398191

Spinal hemangiomas are common, benign vascular lesions that involve the bony portion of vertebral bodies and are generally asymptomatic. Rarely, they can become aggressive and present with predominantly epidural extension, mimicking other neoplasms. We present the case of a fifty-one year old woman who presented with myelopathy and was discovered to have a large mass causing epidural spinal cord compression, thought to be due to a peripheral nerve sheath tumor. She underwent surgery for tumor debulking. Intraoperatively, the mass was found to be mostly epidural with minimal bone involvement. Final pathology demonstrated a cavernous hemangioma. The patient did well post-operatively, with resolution of symptoms and stable size of residual tumor on eighteen month follow-up imaging.


Hemangioma, Cavernous/diagnosis , Neurilemmoma/diagnosis , Spinal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Hemangioma, Cavernous/complications , Hemangioma, Cavernous/pathology , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Middle Aged , Neurilemmoma/pathology , Spinal Cord Compression/etiology , Spinal Neoplasms/complications , Spinal Neoplasms/pathology
19.
Neurosurg Focus ; 44(2): E2, 2018 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29385919

Focused ultrasound (FUS) has been under investigation for neurosurgical applications since the 1940s. Early experiments demonstrated ultrasound as an effective tool for the creation of intracranial lesions; however, they were limited by the need for craniotomy to avoid trajectory damage and wave distortion by the skull, and they also lacked effective techniques for monitoring. Since then, the development and hemispheric distribution of phased arrays has resolved the issue of the skull and allowed for a completely transcranial procedure. Similarly, advances in MR technology have allowed for the real-time guidance of FUS procedures using MR thermometry. MR-guided FUS (MRgFUS) has primarily been investigated for its thermal lesioning capabilities and was recently approved for use in essential tremor. In this capacity, the use of MRgFUS is being investigated for other ablative indications in functional neurosurgery and neurooncology. Other applications of MRgFUS that are under active investigation include opening of the blood-brain barrier to facilitate delivery of therapeutic agents, neuromodulation, and thrombolysis. These recent advances suggest a promising future for MRgFUS as a viable and noninvasive neurosurgical tool, with strong potential for yet-unrealized applications.


Magnetic Resonance Imaging/history , Nervous System Diseases/history , Neurosurgical Procedures/history , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/history , Ultrasonography, Interventional/history , Brain/diagnostic imaging , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Nervous System Diseases/diagnostic imaging
20.
Neuro Oncol ; 20(6): 729-742, 2018 05 18.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29216380

Intradural spinal tumors are rare tumors of the central nervous system. Due to the eloquence of the spinal cord and its tracts, the compact architecture of the cord and nerves, and the infiltrative nature of some of these tumors, surgical resection is difficult to achieve without causing neurological deficits. Likewise, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are utilized more cautiously in the treatment of intradural spinal tumors than their cranial counterparts. Targeted therapies aimed at the genetic alterations and molecular biology tailored to these tumors would be helpful but are lacking.Here, we review the major types of intradural spinal tumors, with an emphasis on genetic alterations, molecular biology, and experimental therapies for these difficult to treat neoplasms.


Astrocytoma/therapy , Ependymoma/therapy , Spinal Neoplasms/therapy , Astrocytoma/genetics , Astrocytoma/pathology , Ependymoma/genetics , Ependymoma/pathology , Humans , Prognosis , Spinal Neoplasms/genetics , Spinal Neoplasms/pathology
...